clear

Ahhhh! Sweet Automobiles!

By Chris | June 2, 2009 |


…and so it begins! Parking at the University of Windsor has always been, well - interesting. But yesterdays orientation brought out the best in everyone! Pedestrians? Hah! You won’t matter until you weight at least 4000 lbs like these cars!

Speaking of the automobile, I saw this email in my mailbox the other day and wanted to post it somewhere, somehow. I don’t always see eye-to-eye with Michael Moore, but this time I thinks he’s heading in the right direction with this “train” of thought…
 

Goodbye, GM
by Michael Moore

June 1, 2009

I write this on the morning of the end of the once-mighty General Motors. By high noon, the President of the United States will have made it official: General Motors, as we know it, has been totaled.

As I sit here in GM’s birthplace, Flint, Michigan, I am surrounded by friends and family who are filled with anxiety about what will happen to them and to the town.  Forty percent of the homes and businesses in the city have been abandoned. Imagine what it would be like if you lived in a city where almost every other house is empty.  What would be your state of mind?

It is with sad irony that the company which invented “planned obsolescence”– the decision to build cars that would fall apart after a few years so that the customer would then have to buy a new one — has now made itself obsolete. It refused to build automobiles that the public wanted, cars that got great gas mileage, were as safe as they could be, and were exceedingly comfortable to drive. Oh — and that wouldn’t start falling apart after two years. GM stubbornly fought environmental and safety regulations. Its executives arrogantly ignored the “inferior” Japanese and German cars, cars which would become the gold standard for automobile buyers. And it was hell-bent on punishing its unionized workforce, lopping off thousands of workers for no good reason other than to “improve” the short-term bottom line of the corporation. Beginning in the 1980s, when GM was posting record profits, it moved countless jobs to Mexico and elsewhere, thus destroying the lives of tens of thousands of hard-working Americans. The  glaring stupidity of this policy was that, when they eliminated the income of so many middle class families, who did they think was going to be able to afford to buy their cars? History will record this blunder in the same way it now writes about the French building the Maginot Line or how the Romans cluelessly poisoned their own water system with lethal lead in its pipes.

So here we are at the deathbed of General Motors. The company’s body not yet cold, and I find myself filled with — dare I say it — joy. It is not the joy of revenge against a corporation that ruined my hometown and brought misery, divorce, alcoholism, homelessness, physical and mental debilitation, and drug addiction to the people I grew up with. Nor do I, obviously, claim any joy in knowing that 21,000 more GM workers will be told that they, too, are without a job.

But you and I and the rest of America now own a car company! I know, I know — who on earth wants to run a car company? Who among us wants $50 billion of our tax dollars thrown down the rat hole of still trying to save GM? Let’s be clear about this: The only way to save GM is to kill GM. Saving our precious industrial infrastructure, though, is another matter and must be a top priority. If we allow the shutting down and tearing down of our auto plants, we will sorely wish we still had them when we realize that those factories could have built the alternative energy systems we now desperately need. And when we realize that the best way to transport ourselves is on light rail and bullet trains and cleaner buses, how will we do this if we’ve allowed our industrial capacity and its skilled workforce to disappear?

Thus, as GM is “reorganized” by the federal government and the bankruptcy court, here is the plan I am asking President Obama to implement for the good of the workers, the GM communities, and the nation as a whole. Twenty years ago when I made “Roger & Me,” I tried to warn people about what was ahead for General Motors.  Had the power structure and the punditocracy listened, maybe much of this could have been avoided. Based on my track record, I request an honest and sincere consideration of the following suggestions:

1. Just as President Roosevelt did after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the President must tell the nation that we are at war and we must immediately convert our auto factories to factories that build mass transit vehicles and alternative energy devices. Within months in Flint in 1942, GM halted all car production and immediately used the assembly lines to build planes, tanks and machine guns. The conversion took no time at all. Everyone pitched in. The fascists were defeated.

We are now in a different kind of war — a war that we have conducted against the ecosystem and has been conducted by our very own corporate leaders. This current war has two fronts. One is headquartered in Detroit. The products built in the factories of GM, Ford and Chrysler are some of the greatest weapons of mass destruction responsible for global warming and the melting of our polar icecaps. The things we call “cars” may have been fun to drive, but they are like a million daggers into the heart of Mother Nature. To continue to build them would only lead to the ruin of our species and much of the planet.

The other front in this war is being waged by the oil companies against you and me.  They are committed to fleecing us whenever they can, and they have been reckless stewards of the finite amount of oil that is located under the surface of the earth.  They know they are sucking it bone dry. And like the lumber tycoons of the early 20th century who didn’t give a damn about future generations as they tore down every forest they could get their hands on, these oil barons are not telling the public what they know to be true — that there are only a few more decades of useable oil on this planet.  And as the end days of oil approach us, get ready for some very desperate people willing to kill and be killed just to get their hands on a gallon can of gasoline.

President Obama, now that he has taken control of GM, needs to convert the factories to new and needed uses immediately.

2. Don’t put another $30 billion into the coffers of GM to build cars. Instead, use that money to keep the current workforce — and most of those who have been laid off– employed so that they can build the new modes of 21st century transportation. Let them start the conversion work now.

3. Announce that we will have bullet trains criss-crossing this country in the next five years. Japan is celebrating the 45th anniversary of its first bullet train this year. Now they have dozens of them. Average speed: 165 mph Average time a train is late: under 30 seconds. They have had these high speed trains for nearly five decades– and we don’t even have one! The fact that the technology already exists for us to go from New York to L.A. in 17 hours by train, and that we haven’t used it, is criminal.  Let’s hire the unemployed to build the new high speed lines all over the country.  Chicago to Detroit in less than two hours. Miami to DC in under 7 hours. Denver to Dallas in five and a half. This can be done and done now.

4. Initiate a program to put light rail mass transit lines in all our large and medium-sized cities. Build those trains in the GM factories. And hire local people everywhere to install and run this system. [This is right and fitting. It was GM (and the rest of the road gang) that killed the trams in the first place. JHC]

5. For people in rural areas not served by the train lines, have the GM plants produce energy efficient clean buses.

6. For the time being, have some factories build hybrid or all-electric cars (and batteries). It will take a few years for people to get used to the new ways to transport ourselves, so if we’re going to have automobiles, let’s have kinder, gentler ones. We can be building these next month (do not believe anyone who tells you it will take years to retool the factories — that simply isn’t true).

7. Transform some of the empty GM factories to facilities that build windmills, solar panels and other means of alternate forms of energy. We need tens of millions of solar panels right now. And there is an eager and skilled workforce who can build them.

8. Provide tax incentives for those who travel by hybrid car or bus or train. Also, credits for those who convert their home to alternative energy.

9. To help pay for this, impose a two-dollar tax on every gallon of gasoline. This will get people to switch to more energy saving cars or to use the new rail lines and rail cars the former autoworkers have built for them.

Well, that’s a start. Please, please, please don’t save GM so that a smaller version of it will simply do nothing more than build Chevys or Cadillacs. This is not a long-term solution. Don’t throw bad money into a company whose tailpipe is malfunctioning, causing a strange odor to fill the car.

100 years ago this year, the founders of General Motors convinced the world to give up their horses and saddles and buggy whips to try a new form of transportation. Now it is time for us to say goodbye to the internal combustion engine. It seemed to serve us well for so long. We enjoyed the car hops at the A&W. We made out in the front — and the back — seat. We watched movies on large outdoor screens, went to the races at NASCAR tracks across the country, and saw the Pacific Ocean for the first time through the window down Hwy. 1. And now it’s over. It’s a new day and a new century. The President — and the UAW — must seize this moment and create a big batch of lemonade from this very sour and sad lemon.

Yesterday, the last surviving person from the Titanic disaster passed away. She escaped certain death that night and went on to live another 97 years.

So can we survive our own Titanic in all the Flint Michigans of this country. 60% of GM is ours. I think we can do a better job.

Yours,
Michael Moore

Less Caddys and more streetcars. I guess if we’re going to be dumping our tax dollars into a company (Harper is also committed to buying stock in GM) , we may as well do it our way.  Attaboy, Michael!  Mind if I forward this to our Prime Minister as well?  I’ll give you writing credit.  Promise!

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , ,

15 Readers left Feedback


  1. Dave on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 7:43 am reply Reply

    No reason why we can’t have cars and light rail? Europe does it, Japan does it and now China is doing it. Why is it an either/or option?

    I think we could cut back on the amount of $$ spent on road construction/expansion and put that to light rail. But in order for light rail to succeed (or any rail for that matter) we have to condense our cities. The biggest problem in N. America is our sprawl and the distance between cities (especially Canada and we can’t do much about that).

    If gov’ts (read provincial) don’t legislate the stopping of sprawl like they do the “ban of the day” then I think it would be money well wasted because it doesn’t give a proper alternative to the consumer.

    I would still keep my car for vacations and some longer commutes but if rail is still a pain to use then I as a lazy consumer (like everyone else) won’t buy it. However if ew had more denisty inour city the ability for light rail soars and people will use it (Montreal, T.O. NY, Portland for example).

    Let’s try and get this issue raised in the next provincial election.

    But just a quick note. Perhaps Moore shouldn’t be celebrating his own schadenfreude just yet. Considering that if GM ceases to exist (no not on paper in real life) he has really no clue as to the impact it would have of the N. American economy. It would be catastropohic with nothing being able to change it for many years. I for one, don’t want to see what that will be like.

    1. PFA on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 9:53 am reply Reply

      Wait a second — Canadians are on the hook for $10 billion to bailout GM. Ontario has said upwards of 85,000 jobs could be lost. First — never trust government numbers. Second, what sort of re-training, retooling, reinventing initiatives could be had for $10 billion? Break it down — it’s approx $117,000 for every job that could potentially be lost. No offense, but I am not overly confident that we can preserve 85,000 jobs in the broken industry that GM and Chrysler represent let alone the 7,000 or so direct jobs. Spin this — Canadian tax payers are spending, even by the CAW numbers, $10 billion to save 49,000 jobs for an undetermined, non-guaranteed amount of time. That’s $204,000 for every job based on the CAW ratio of 1:7. Folks — you can do a whole lot more than save a failed industry with $200,000 per job.

      New GM? New Chrysler? Bah! It’s all spin. Start making something new, something really forward thinking, then I will be willing to invest taxpayer dollars. Nothing will change as there is no accountability to the people or governments who are bailing them out. Give it a couple of years — they will be back at the public troughs sooner than rather than later.

  2. JP on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 10:33 am reply Reply

    Yes, but we are at a ‘war’ of sorts… with the oil-way-of-life. Its a war that will fight the oil companies and car companies, yes, but also its a war to fight against economic ruin. I have always thought that converting these factories into the “Arsenal of Greenology” is the best way forward. It is time to take our government manufacturing companies and start producing what the government needs at prices the government needs them at. Mass transit and fuel efficient small cars will save the economy. Inner city mass transit infrastructure (not buses), inter-city high speed rail, and small, clean and efficient rental cars (like ‘zip-cars’) will work!

  3. Tim Miron on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 10:50 am reply Reply

    I took the VIA train the other day - I was dissapointed by the lack of “Gliding” feeling I’d become so used to taking even simple commuter trains in Japan. The ride was downright bumpy at times - VIA needs to invest some money in maintaining their tracks in these parts, its giving rail a bad name.

    1. Mark Bradley on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 11:17 am reply Reply

      Tim, the scuttle in Ottawa is that Conservatives are looking to sell Via and few other assets, so don’t expect any money to be spent any time soon.

      1. JP on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 11:43 am reply Reply

        Mark, do you think that the sale of VIA would help the effort to build a high-speed corridor, or will it hinder it? Private companies would likely only be interested in the Toronto-Montreal route (i think). Is this the conservatives plan to screw over Ignatieff’s plan? If they sell VIA, that would mean that Ignatieff’s Windsor-Quebec rail corridor will cost so much money, that it probably would be impossible. Cons fight for Alberta and only Alberta (remember, they are the Reform Party in reality). At least Ignatieff is trying to build a sustainable rail corridor that would service nearly 50% of Canada’s population, and will form links in the Detroit-Chicago corridor, as well as NY state, this has huge potential!

        1. Mark Bradley on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 1:04 pm reply Reply

          Harper isn’t interested in high speed rail and to top it all off nor is he interested in cities. Yes, it would be more expensive for a P3 to get involved in high speed rail, VIA at this moment rents its line from CP that is why freight trains have the priority over passenger trains, the acquistion of extra land would be enormous!

          1. Tim Miron on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 1:14 pm reply Reply (Comments won't nest below this level)

            The only 2 continents in the world that dont have high speed rail are North America and….. Africa! Not to dump on africa but it escapes me why we are at the same level in terms of infrastructure in this respect as a continent that is largley made up of 3rd world countries.

  4. kdduck on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 4:04 pm reply Reply

    You can toss all the money you want at them, however at the end of the day did they sell?
    GM is getting rid of 800 dealers. That 800 dealers the competition can pick up. Same with Chrysler.
    Maybe it is time to realize the big vehicles are gone.
    I find it ironic that GM had a difficult time selling Humers in China yet China looks like they are buying the division. They will build them for pennies compared to the US and then still sell them over here.
    What were they thinking?

  5. Dave on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 5:10 pm reply Reply

    I will say it Ignatieff is a prick. He isn’t going to build anything unless it is with YOUR tax dollars and even then he will say anything to get elected. Just look at his contradictions as he speaks across the country. He says one thing on the east coast while saying the exact opposite in the west. Maclean’s did a great article a few months back on it. He seems to want to be the next Trudeau. For me, one was enough.

    As for the 49,000 good wage jobs tha twould be lost, think of the spin off jobs tha twould be affected. That is the real issue.

    I am all for green technology but if you look at the real numbers (my company has had to do just that) they don’t employ nearly the amount of people the population thinks it will. It is not a replaceable economy for that of the automobile.
    But again why not both. Better yet why are we losing the economic race for rechargeable batteries to China? We should be on the very forefront of green technology as well as sustaining automotive while building new LTR/high speed railways. Where are the investors? Why do we piss away so much money onthe nanny/welfare state? Doing the above would remove the latter.

    Besides, why should we capitulate our economy yet again? We have given enough of our past economies away for nothing but greed and cheap goods which exacerbates the very sprawl we rail against here on SD.

    VenetianDave signing off.

  6. Timothy Miron on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 8:54 pm reply Reply

    There’s was an interesting looking show this morning on CBC Radio 1’s “The Current” called “Weaning Cities Off Cars” that discusses some shifts in urban design and the move away from auto-centric civil engineering.

    It can be listened to here (scroll down to part 2)
    http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/2009/200906/20090602.html

    1. Chris Holt on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 at 9:03 pm reply Reply

      Thanks for the link, Tim!

  7. JP on Wednesday, June 3, 2009 at 2:36 pm reply Reply

    Maybe there is hope:
    http://www.freep.com/article/20090603/NEWS06/90603070/Granholm+makes+case+for+rail+car+production+in+Michigan

  8. JP on Thursday, June 4, 2009 at 2:18 pm reply Reply

    “HIGH SPEED RAIL” featured on The Agenda with Steve Paikin (TVO) Thurs June 4, 2009 @ 8pm. (ED - that’s tonight, folks!) “The economy and the environment: the latest arguments for high speed rail in Canada.”
    http://www.tvo.org/cfmx/tvoorg/theagenda/index.cfm?page_id=7&bpn=779527&ts=2009-06-04%2020:00:35.0

    Also, copies of the 2008 Ontario/Quebec Rail Feasibility Study are now available: http://highspeedrail.ca/
    enjoy!

  9. Mark Bradley on Sunday, June 7, 2009 at 6:37 am reply Reply

    Chris scooped even the Huntington Post with this posting of Moore’s letter, which is publishing it today, Sunday, June 7, 2009. By a week!

Feedback Form


 

clear