Isn’t it ironic? Don’tcha think?
We’ve been slacking on our pseudo-regular posting schedule as of late, but there is actually some justification to our seemingly lacklustre attitude to our publishing regiment. You see, we’ve been working dilligently on trying to raise public awareness in Walkerville in an attempt to keep the bulldozers away from the old Bank of Montreal building. At the same time we’ve been working on a roundtable discussion forum on the effects of urban sprawl with our friends over at the Artcite Gallery.
Which brings me to an explanation which will make you understand the title of this post a little better. While arranging panelists for our roundtable forum, I’ve been thinking to myself how easier this is now as I no longer need to get into long, lengthy discussions about why the urban sprawl issue is harmful to our community. People “get it” now. I came to this conclusion when I was on the telephone with Joe Rauti, president of the Greater Windsor Home Builders Association, inviting him to participate as a panelist. Joe and I had a long talk about how his membership was suffering during the recent real estate collapse and how the ‘burbs are no longer the hot-bed of activity they once were. We discussed the obstacles he experiences when trying to build infill housing and how we could work together to attempt to make it easier and more profitable for his membership to begin developing in the downtown core, specifically the Urban Village. It was a great conversation, and I look forward to Mr. Rauti’s participation in the forum.
This is a conversation that has been a long-time-coming. We need to work together with our local developers, as we are each a key player in revitalizing this city of ours. So, as I was experiencing this epiphany of developer/activist participation, we went to council last night in an effort to work with the developer of that key parcel of core land in Olde Walkerville to try and save the old BofM building from the wrecking ball. In my presentation, I ackowledged the developers rich history of adaptive re-use and urban infill while reminding him of the responsibility he has to the larger community. All true, as his Club Lofts retrofit of Hiram Walker’s old warehouse, when completed, will further enrich the tapestry of Olde Walkerville and (hopefully) bring new residents into the area. We need to develop working relationships with developers such as these who have experience in something other than sprawl building.
Yet it wasn’t meant to be. As you know, the bank building wasn’t yet on the heritage inventory (the city dropped the ball on that one, too), and the developer’s lawyer took advantage of that fact and was threatening legal action left, right and centre. Ultimately, when it came down to the vote, only three of our councilors (Hatfield, Halberstadt and Valentinis) opted for designation. Even the two councilors (Jones and Brister) who sit on the Windsor Heritage Committee voted against designation. While this was a bleak, yet unsurprising outcome, there was actually some light shining from behind the other seven clouds sitting in council chambers.
City council was embroiled in some of the best debate regarding the preservation of our architectural heritage that I have ever seen. They ackowledge that our process is flawed and needs to be examined. They actually split the vote into three parts, the first being that council look into our process and determine whether we could do things better. The second part was the failed bid for designation, and the last was a token request that the developer “look into” preserving some of the limestone details of the building. I guess this council likes saving trophies of our architectural past and store them in perpetuity in some warehouse somewhere.
So, while I know that we lost yet another of our heritage buildings, I hope that we have built our case and foundation for saving the next building a little stronger. My hat goes off to Councilors Hatfield, Halberstadt and Valentinis for doing their best to save the old girl. Councilor Hatfield gave an impassioned plea for designation, (while the ward 2 & 4 councilors, who have the bulk of the remaining heritage properties in their wards, were more than willing to not raise a fuss) saying this city needs to take a stand against the wanton destruction of our architectural heritage, and how embarassing it is for this council to be dealing with the continued demolition of our past.
We must perservere and continue to raise the flags when we see people wanting to tear apart the pieces of this city that actually work. I invite everyone to the Roundtable Discussion on the Effects of Urban Sprawl taking place tomorrow night at the Artcite Gallery, beginning at 7:00. The higher the awareness of these issues, the easier it will be to put an and to destructive development patterns.
Tags: Architecture, City Council, community building, revitalization, Urban Design, urban sprawl, walkerville













Is the roundtable discussion about the effects or will the urban village be brought up as well? Sadly I have a prior engagement and would have loved to sit in and listen to this discussion…never enough time in a day or week.
I am hoping to delve more into a “Where do we go from here” discussion, and if we do the Urban Village will definitely be brought up.
There are so many tools available to municipalities, and seeing the expertise that we will have around the table, we would be crazy not to investigate what those tools are and why our municipality isn’t incorporating them into their policy framework.
In the end, we can bitch and complain all we want, but that isn’t going to move the city forward in a progressive way. We need to go legit and sit at the decision making table and be a part of the discussion. We have a lot to offer, but if we marginalize ourselves, those suggestions will go unheard.
Chris, that is some of the most poignant and centred advice I have heard in a long time. The time for opposition for the sake of opposition is past, the time to come to the table with real solutions is now.
Just one question though — does that mean I may actually get to see you in a suit and tie one day?
Don’t hold your breath, Josh. I got a haircut, and that will have to suffice for now
I’m with Josh, its time for the rubber to hit the road already! Lets get some old policies and bylaws up to speed already. Start affecting change!! There are countless cities not dissimilar to Windsor in the least that have already adopted peak oil policies and greater focus on mass transit, denser community building, etc… ‘Cheap oil fiesta is over’ What is Windsor waiting for ????? Ya, so, our current leadership sucks, but, theres more of us than there is of them…we can work around them…
Agreed. I just wish I didn’t have a prior engagement.
For the future count me in inhelping to build and restore our sustainable, walkable communities. The days of certain developers doing whatever they want without regard are over!
After watching the City Council it seemed rather odd that the two members of the Heritage Committee voted against the proposal.
I look forward to attending the roundtable although I will be a bit late.
This seems to be a productive and formidable group. Good Luck!